CRAN Package Check Results for Package car

Last updated on 2024-07-12 15:52:43 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 3.1-2 20.05 185.02 205.07 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 3.1-2 15.94 127.36 143.30 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 3.1-2 275.65 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 3.1-2 248.15 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64 3.1-2 20.00 178.00 198.00 NOTE
r-patched-linux-x86_64 3.1-2 27.22 169.46 196.68 NOTE
r-release-linux-x86_64 3.1-2 14.77 168.14 182.91 NOTE
r-release-macos-arm64 3.1-2 69.00 NOTE
r-release-macos-x86_64 3.1-2 119.00 NOTE
r-release-windows-x86_64 3.1-2 20.00 174.00 194.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 3.1-2 74.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 3.1-2 117.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 3.1-2 27.00 200.00 227.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 3.1-2
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) compareCoefs.Rd:30: Lost braces 30 | \item{pvals}{If code{TRUE} (the default is \code{FALSE}), print two-sided p-values | ^ checkRd: (-1) mcPlots.Rd:38: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 38 | axis. To plot against a factor, you need to specify the full name of one of the indicator variables that define the factor. For example, for a factor called \code{type} with levels \code{A}, \code{B} and {C}, using the usual drop-first level parameterization of the factor, the regressors for \code{type} would be \code{typeB} or \code{typeC}. Similarly, to plot against the regressor \code{log(X4)}, you must specify \code{"log((X4)"}, not \code{"X4"}. | ^ checkRd: (-1) scatterplot.Rd:137: Lost braces 137 | For \code{style="filled"} several subarguments modify the appearance of the region: code{alpha} is a number between 0 and 1 that specifies opacity with defualt 0.15, \code{border}, \code{TRUE} or \code{FALSE} specifies a border for the envelope, and \code{vertical} either \code{TRUE} or \code{FALSE}, modifies the behavior of the envelope at the edges of the graph. | ^ Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64

Version: 3.1-2
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Undeclared package ‘plotrix’ in Rd xrefs Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 3.1-2
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package anchors: Anova.Rd: anova.coxph Boot.Rd: boot, boot.array, boot.ci, plot.boot, empinf Ellipses.Rd: cov.trob S.Rd: multinom, polr, summary.multinom ScatterplotSmoothers.Rd: gam, rqss, qss avPlots.Rd: cov.trob boxCox.Rd: boxcox boxCoxVariable.Rd: boxcox hist.boot.Rd: boot, boot.ci influence-mixed-models.Rd: lme marginalModelPlot.Rd: gam poTest.Rd: polr scatter3d.Rd: gam scatterplot.Rd: cov.trob scatterplotMatrix.Rd: cov.trob, gam, rqss symbox.Rd: boxcox Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the package itself and the base packages. Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64

Version: 3.1-2
Check: package dependencies
Result: NOTE Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘alr4’ Flavor: r-oldrel-macos-x86_64